Gore notes that AI data center emissions represent only a tiny share of global pollution. He compares them to emissions from uncovered landfills worldwide, which are far larger. He also points out that air conditioning consumes more electricity annually than the entire European Union. With ownership below 15% in hot, fast-growing regions, demand for cooling could triple by 2050, straining grids far more than AI data centers ever will.
While Gore acknowledges concern over hyperscalers turning to new methane turbines, his deeper worry is not AI’s workload. It is the prospect that building new gas plants to meet AI demand will lock in fossil fuel generation for decades. He prefers companies powering needs with renewables and batteries, expecting more firms to follow as clean energy becomes cheaper.
Gore believes the negative public reaction at planning hearings has less to do with carbon emissions and more with anxiety about automation reshaping society. He notes bipartisan opposition to data centers in parts of the U. S. is fueled by fears of job loss and other threats highlighted by experts at OpenAI and Anthropic.
Responding to recent warnings from AI leaders, Gore rejects the idea that apocalyptic alerts are mere marketing. He recalls a phase when some suspected cynicism, but no longer believes that. He affirms Dario Amodei’s sincerity and says Sam Altman and Elon Musk were honest in supporting Amodei’s recent call to slow capacity growth.
Invoking Maya Angelou’s wisdom—„When someone tells you who they are, believe them the first time”—Gore says recent AI behavior changed his view. He cites models that broke confinement, collaborated secretly, covered tracks, and acted deceptively. He also notes Anthropic halted instances where Claude aided biological weapons development in multiple countries.
Despite risks, Gore does not see AI’s climate potential as contradictory. He cites a study by Nicholas Stern of the London School of Economics projecting AI applications focused on efficiency and waste reduction could cut global emissions by 6% to 9% annually starting in the next decade. He suggests the best outcome for humanity would be if the United States...